Satyabhama Daily Serial
Watch Satyabhama Daily Serial online
Today’s Episode:
E108 – Part1 : Part2 – 17th May
Previous Episode:
E107 – Part1 : Part2 – 16th May
E106 – Part1 : Part2 – 15th May
E105 – Part1 : Part2 – 14th May
E104 – Part1 : Part2 – 13th May
E103 – Part1 : Part2 – 9th May
E102 – Part1 : Part2 – 8th May
E101 – Part1 : Part2 – 7th May
E100 – Part1 : Part2 – 6th May
E99 – Part1 : Part2 – 3rd May
E98 – Part1 : Part2 -2nd May
E97 – Part1 : Part2 -1st May
E96 – Part1 : Part2 -30th Apr
E95 – Part1 : Part2 -29th Apr
E94 – Part1 : Part2 -26th Apr
E93 – Part1 : Part2 -25th Apr
E92 – Part1 : Part2 -24th Apr
E91 – Part1 : Part2 -23rd Apr
E90 – Part1 : Part2 -22nd Apr
E89 – Part1 : Part2 -19th Apr
E88 – Part1 : Part2 -18th Apr
E87 – Part1 : Part2 -17th Apr
E86 – Part1 : Part2 -16th Apr
E85 – Part1 : Part2 -15th Apr
E84 – Part1 : Part2 -12th Apr
E83 – Part1 : Part2 -11th Apr
E82 – Part1 : Part2 -10th Apr
E81 – Part1 : Part2 -9th Apr
E80 – Part1 : Part2 – 8th Apr
E79 – Part1 : Part2 – 5th Apr
E78 – Part1 : Part2 – 4th Apr
E77 – Part1 : Part2 – 3rd Apr
E76 – Part1 : Part2 – 2nd Apr
E75 – Part1 : Part2 – 1st Apr
E74 – Part1 : Part2 – 29th Mar
E73 – Part1 : Part2 – 28th Mar
E72 – Part1 : Part2 – 27th Mar
E71 – Part1 : Part2 – 26th Mar
E70 – Part1 : Part2 – 25th Mar
E69 – Part1 : Part2 – 22nd Mar
Recent Random Post:
Why is Suriya’s House Under Police Protection?
Kollywood star Suriya’s residence in Chennai has been under police protection for the past two and a half years, sparking a public discussion about the extended duration of this security measure. While Suriya has reportedly not been residing in Chennai for over a year, his home continues to be guarded by police personnel, raising questions about the necessity of such a deployment.
The controversy stems from Suriya’s involvement in the 2021 film “Jai Bhim,” released on Amazon Prime Video. The movie, directed by T.J. Gnanavel and co-starring Suriya’s wife Jyothika, received critical acclaim but also attracted controversy. The “Rudra Vanniyar Sena” organization alleged that certain scenes in the film portrayed their community disrespectfully. The movie’s depiction of the Irular tribe (an Adivasi group) allegedly being tortured by members of the Vanniyar community sparked outrage.
In response to the film, the “Rudra Vanniyar Sena” reportedly announced a reward of 1 lakh rupees (approximately $1230 USD) for anyone who attacked Suriya. Additionally, they demanded a public apology from the actor and a compensation of 5 crores rupees (approximately $615,000 USD). Citing these threats, the Tamil Nadu government authorized police protection for Suriya’s residence in T Nagar, Chennai.
However, the continued presence of four police officers guarding the currently unoccupied residence has drawn criticism. Social worker Krishna Murthy questioned the rationale behind maintaining this security detail in Suriya’s absence. With the news gaining traction, many have expressed concerns about the allocation of state resources for seemingly unnecessary security measures. This situation has highlighted potential shortcomings in the government’s approach to security and resource management.
